Kombinasi Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan PIPRECIA dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Barista
Abstract
Barista acceptance selection is a crucial stage in building a quality team in the coffee industry. This process not only looks for individuals with technical skills in processing coffee, but also emphasizes other aspects such as communication skills, customer service, and appearance. The combination of MOORA and PIPRECIA methods can be used to optimize several goals at once by considering the ratio between positive and negative solutions in determining the best alternative based on several criteria. This study aims to select barista acceptance by applying a combination of MOORA and PIPRECIA methods based on the criteria used, namely ability, knowledge, experience, communication, and appearance. So that the results of the combination of MOORA and PIRRECIA methods will be a recommendation for management in selecting barista acceptance. The ranking results for rank 1 with the final value of MOORA optimization of 0.428 were obtained by Yanto, rank 2 with the final value of MOORA optimization of 0.423 was obtained by Ridho, and rank 3 with the final value of MOORA optimization of 0.414 was obtained by Antoni. The benefit of this study will be a recommendation for coffee shop owners in conducting barista selection using a decision support system model. Future research may add other criteria such as barista education and training.
Downloads
References
A. Prehanto, Buku Kurikulum Barista Profesional (Dasar), vol. 2. Adi Prehanto, 2019.
A. Surahman, “Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan Pembobotan Entropy,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2024.
A. D. Amanda, F. N. Arieni, and A. P. Windarto, “Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on The Basic of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) pada Pemilihan Masker Organik Wajah Berdasarkan Kriteria,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 289–296, 2021.
S. Wulan, E. Pratiwi, M. Mesran, and D. Desyanti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Penentuan Kinerja Tenaga Pendidik Terbaik Menerapkan Metode MOORA,” Bull. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–64, 2022.
N. Hasdyna, M. Mutasar, and U. Khairati, “ANALISIS METODE MOORA DALAM SISTEM SELEKSI PENERIMAAN KARYAWAN PADA PERUMDA TIRTA PASE ACEH UTARA,” Sisfo J. Ilm. Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–125, 2022.
M. Mesran, R. F. Wahyu, and F. Gea, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Parking Area Menerapkan Metode MOORA,” Bull. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107–118, 2021.
S. Chakraborty, H. N. Datta, K. Kalita, and S. Chakraborty, “A narrative review of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method in decision making,” OPSEARCH, pp. 1–44, 2023.
Y. D. Lestari, M. Eka, and R. Saragih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan IT Support Perusahan Telekomunikasi Terbaik Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” Algoritm. J. ILMU Komput. DAN Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, 2021.
T. Barik, S. Parida, and K. Pal, “Optimizing the input parameters setting for least hole defects while drilling CFRP laminates by multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, vol. 2484, no. 1, p. 12007.
C. S. Dhanalakshmi, M. Mathew, and P. Madhu, “Biomass material selection for sustainable environment by the application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA),” in Materials, Design, and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment: Select Proceedings of ICMDMSE 2020, 2021, pp. 345–354.
S. Setiawansyah and S. Sintaro, Monograf: Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan. Bandar Lampung: CV Keranjang Teknologi Media, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ebook.kertekmedia.com/detailebook.php?title=Monograf:-Metode-Multi-Attribute-Utility-Theory-Dalam-Pengambilan-Keputusan
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, and G. Popovic, “RANKING ALTERNATIVES USING PIPRECIA METHOD: A CASE OF HOTELS’WEBSITE EVALUATION,” J. Process Manag. new Technol., vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 62–68, 2021.
A. Ulutaş, A. Topal, D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, G. Popovic, and F. Smarandache, “Prioritization of logistics risks with plithogenic PIPRECIA method,” in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, pp. 663–670.
S. H. Hadad et al., “Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i1.4544.
R. T. Aldisa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Barista Coffee Terbaik Menerapkan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan ROC,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1022–1030, 2023.
A. Maulana and A. Suprianur, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pencarian Karyawan Baru Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching (Studi Kasus: Jingga Coffeshop),” EJECTS J. Comput. Technol. Informations Syst., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2023.
Y. K. Gulo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Barista Dengan Menggunakan Metode DEMATEL Dan WASPAS (Studi Kasus: Coffee Corner Medan),” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 210–217, 2021.
T. Widodo, “Kombinasi Simple Additive Weighted dan Rank Order Centroid Dalam Pemilihan Vendor Catering,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2024.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sanriomi Sintaro, Setiawansyah Setiawansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


.png)









