Kombinasi Pembobotan PIPRECIA-S dan Metode SAW dalam Pemilihan Ketua Organisasi Sekolah

Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Very Hendra Saputra

doi:10.58602/jima-ilkom.v2i1.16

Setiawansyah Setiawansyah Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Very Hendra Saputra Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/jima-ilkom.v2i1.16

Keywords: PIPRECIA-S, Election, Ranking, Recommendations, SAW

Abstract

This study aims to select the head of the school organization using the SAW method and PIPRECIA-S weighting, so that the assessment results in the weighting of criteria are more objective based on calculations from the PIPRECIA-S weighting method. The results of the election of the head of the school organization using the SAW method and the weighting of PIPRECIA-S recommended Jamaludin as a candidate for the head of the school organization because the final results of the ranking got Rank 1 with a total score of 1,821. Rank 2 was obtained by Bustomi with a final score of 1,763, rank 3 was obtained by Budiman with a final value of 1,698. The test results based on filling out questionnaires from each category 73% strongly agree, 25% agree, 2% are sufficient, and 0% disagree, so that they can be used in determining candidates for organizational chairman.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Sari, A. M. H. Pardede, and R. Saragih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Pemanen Kelapa Sawit Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Moora (Studi Kasus PT. Lnk Kebun Bekiun),” in Seminar Nasional Informatika (SENATIKA), 2021, pp. 265–276.

A. Surahman and N. Nursadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kenaikan Gaji Karyawan Dengan Metode Topsis Berbasis Web,” JTKSI (Jurnal Teknol. Komput. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 82–87, 2019.

B. Aprilia and A. H. Azhar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kepala Gudang Pada PT. Charoen Pokphand Medan Menggunakan Metode SMART,” Inf. Syst. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2022.

D. Fathulyaqin, U. Darusalam, and I. D. Sholihati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kualitas Produk UPS Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Topsis dan SAW,” STRING (Satuan Tulisan Ris. dan Inov. Teknol., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 55, 2021, doi: 10.30998/string.v6i1.9898.

I. Sugiana, A. I. Hadiana, and P. N. Sabrina, “SISTEM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MEMILIH UMKM YANG LAYAK MENDAPATKAN BANTUAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Elektro, Sistem Informasi, dan Teknik Informatika (SNESTIK), 2022, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 351–356.

D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, G. Popovic, and C. Sava, “Simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) method,” Rom. J. Econ. Forecast., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 141, 2021.

G. Popović, G. Milovanović, and Đ. Pucar, “A Multiple-Criteria Approach to RFID Solution Provider Selection,” PaKSoM 2022, p. 457, 2022.

R. Nuraini, Y. Daniarti, I. P. Irwansyah, A. A. J. Sinlae, and S. Setiawansyah, “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan TOPSIS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Wireless Router,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 411–419, 2022.

A. A. Aldino, E. D. Pratiwi, Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, and A. D. Putra, “Comparison Of Market Basket Analysis To Determine Consumer Purchasing Patterns Using Fp-Growth And Apriori Algorithm,” in 2021 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE), 2021, pp. 29–34. doi: 10.1109/ICOMITEE53461.2021.9650317.

Setiawansyah, H. Sulistiani, and D. Darwis, “Penerapan Metode Agile untuk Pengembangan Online Analytical Processing ( OLAP ) pada Data Penjualan ( Studi Kasus : CV Adilia Lestari ),” J. CoreIT, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2020.